General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
The New Yorker reviewed this same book and author a while back. He makes some interesting points, especially comparing the interactivity of books against video games.
Books: You are essentially passive. True, your brain is visualizing what you read, so you're do some work interpreting it, but there's no measure of success or failure to challenge you to continue. The ending is always the same, and you're rarely the one doing the problem solving. Video games: Geared to exercise your problem solving skills, these can range from managing a virtual empire, to figuring out good dogfighting techniques, to finding your way out of a maze. One line that was a real kicker said something to the effect that if video games had come out first and then books were invented later in mankind's history, there's no doubt that society would look down on books as "unchallenging" or "shallow" or "dumbed-down entertainment". |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
Originally posted by Jaguar
That's a rather typical response from a 30-year-old without kids. Just because you grew up without video games doesn't mean young kids can't pick them up really quickly. To adults, learning the rules of an entirely new world is somewhat difficult. It takes a 35-year-old longer to master Mario Kart than it takes an 8-year-old. To kids, it's second nature to learn the rules of new worlds. They're still learning the rules of the first one. So in the same way I learned that one must wash hands after going to the bathroom, I learned that Chivalry was unnecessary if you weren't planning a war, because it was a dead-end tech which only led to a single unit. I was looking at your profile to see how old you were, and I noticed you're a chess player. Did you play when you were young at any competitive events? Did you meet those kids who are seven or younger but better than players twice their age? While adults have much more life experience, it's not necessarily relevant in games. Knowing the course of history doesn't actually help you in Civilization. I can recall asking my mother whether there were Ironclads in 1310, because I had gotten an ironclad then. A little kid can't be expected to know the course of history. He can, however, learn to create roads around his cities to increase the number of orange and yellow arrows. And that's all he needs. Ozzy, QFT me. ok ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|