General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#61 |
|
The only person actually affected by this, at this point, is Massa - made no difference to the team's points for the race.
I could understand implied 'team orders' if it was at the end of the season but with 8 races still to run, there's a lot of oppertunity for Alonso to have problems and for Massa to take the lead - this could come back to bite them in the rear end. Certainly it's going to have a drastic affect on Massa's confidence in the team and the moral of the team itself if he's as popular, and Alonso as unpopular, as I suspect! 100k may not be much compared to their overall budget (maybe 500M?) but it's more the fine than the amount that'll sting them - and maybe people's opinion - but as long as they're selling cars I doubt they'll care that much. Going to be interesting how this plays out in the following days and weeks ... |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
|
perhaps the amount sould have been higher tho. Banning testing on Friday would be a fairer punishment, if the FIA want this to stop outright. |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 |
|
Exactly. They will have earned several million $ from the result today in terms of money next season, and $100,000 is pittance to Ferrari/Fiat. It doesn't matter that it wasn't technically Massa's fault; it actually was partially his fault for letting him pass him pass. This is the team's responsibility, and the WHOLE team should pay the price. |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
|
The only person actually affected by this, at this point, is Massa - made no difference to the team's points for the race. At the end of the day, if they want this to stop OUTRIGHT, they must make a severe punishment for it. 15 grid place drop, starting from the pitlane next race, excluding that day's result, or banning friday practice. There are many teams that can afford $100,000; the FIA have basically said to the other teams, for $100,000 you can fix whoever wins the grand prix if you have both cars in 1st and 2nd. Outrageous. |
![]() |
![]() |
#68 |
|
the drivers need to be left out of any punishment i think, neither of them deserve to suffer for something they had no control over, they are employees of ferrari remember. Tell your employer you wont do what they ask of you andsee what happens. if anything else happens then like what happened to mclaren, ferrari should loose constructors points, perhaps this year and next.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#69 |
|
So they bought the right to break the sports rules for 100K... not bad [rolleyes]
Ferrari should be disqualified from the constructors championship. Let's not forget that this is the second time they do it; yes the rule didn't exist when they did it first time but it was specifically brought in because of that incident and now they do it again. They're bringing the sport into disrepute and they are in contempt with the regulation. 100k fine??pffff they could pay it right there with pocket change[rolleyes] |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 |
|
The only person actually affected by this, at this point, is Massa - made no difference to the team's points for the race. It wont happen though since massa has probably lost all confidence, and won't just be a 2nd driver, but race like one. I want webber to take the championship at this point, or button. |
![]() |
![]() |
#71 |
|
the drivers need to be left out of any punishment i think, neither of them deserve to suffer for something they had no control over, they are employees of ferrari remember. Tell your employer you wont do what they ask of you andsee what happens. if anything else happens then like what happened to mclaren, ferrari should loose constructors points, perhaps this year and next. The most Ferrari could have done was buy out his contract provided there wasn't a term in his contract that he must follow orders that specifically mean he has to let his teammate through, in which case, Ferrari boss should be kicked out of the sport like what happened with Renault. |
![]() |
![]() |
#73 |
|
No, it is a driver decision as well. The pitcrew can't suddenly slow the engine down so the other can pass; when Massa received that radio message; he had a choice whether to abide by it or not. try it at work, tell your boss your not gonna do what he asks. let me know how it goes. if massa didnt they would make it very hard for massa in the future. |
![]() |
![]() |
#77 |
|
Car telemetry is one way. The guys in the pits have no control over the car.
All this talk of throwing them out of the championship, or banning the head of Ferrari like happened with Renault (as if what Ferrari did was even comparable with what Renault did) is just silly imho. Yes, what Ferrari did was wrong, but let's not get carried away. |
![]() |
![]() |
#78 |
|
Car telemetry is one way. The guys in the pits have no control over the car. |
![]() |
![]() |
#79 |
|
No, it is a driver decision as well. The pitcrew can't suddenly slow the engine down so the other can pass; when Massa received that radio message; he had a choice whether to abide by it or not. Massa had no real option but to pull over - in the old days, he'd've "missed a gear" or "run wide" to fudge it. I also think Smedley (sp?) was also very unhappy about being made to make the call to Massa, when it should have been the team principle who didn't have the bottle to do it himself - which may also have morale affects as he may lose some respect from other team members. As I said earlier, I'm in favour of team orders, but while the regulations ban them, they shouldn't be used! |
![]() |
![]() |
#80 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|