General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
Originally posted by
![]() This and many of its other associated problems can be solved if an equal number of women are married to multiple men. That's not going to happen. You only need to look at the disasters that befell many communes to know what a daft idea it is. What will happen is that a few men will accrue several wives, leaving other men out in the cold. They won't take this very well at all, and a rise in criminal behaviour from said men is inevitable. A few women will marry more than one man, but sheer biology means that polygamy tends to suit men more than women. In theory, things like polygamy and polyamory sound fine, and there are always a few people who could probably make it work in a non-exploitative way, but for most people it will be a disaster waiting to happen, and it's simply more efficient to ban it for everyone. |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
Originally posted by SlowwHand
Some of you people live in an absolute dream world. As hard as it is to find a compatable individual, you vote for polygamy. ![]() ![]() ![]() If you actually took the time to read what many people are saying... you would see that people think it should be legal... not necessarily that it something they would want to do... hell... one wife is more than enough for me ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
Originally posted by lord of the mark
Polyamory, IIUC, is a 'lifestyle' (and is most definitely quite legal here in the states) polygamy, OTOH, is a legal arrangement, and is NOT. Actually, even monogamy as a lifestyle is illegal in 7 states. |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
Originally posted by St Leo
I think the simplest approach would be to lift restrictions on "bigamy" or multiple marriages. x can marry y x can marry z x can marry w w can marry t t can marry y y can marry z Moo. Problem is, under current law, if x goes into debt, the creditor can go after Y's assets. Which presumably means Y can be forced to use Ts assets to pay off X's debt, even though T never consented to the marriag to X. Y'all seem to think this is about sex. Except for the states leo mentioned, who rarely enforce their laws anyway, anyone can live with and sleep with whomever they want. Its about legal relationships. Property. Etc. |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|