General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
|
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
Well, math types will say "It's true, because 1+1 = 2" which is correct for their way of thinking. For liberal arts types, the name of the item is as important as the contents of it; and "1+1" and "2" are named in a much different manners, and to them that's important.
To me I don't care ... I have no use for "1+1" thus it matters not to me what it is or isn't. See? This is new math. All opinions are allowed, it would intolerant to exclude different viewpoints out. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
Okay....let us assume that A = B
Then, multiply by A: = B2 = AB Subtract B square: A2 - B2 = AB - B2 Factor: (A+B)(A-B) = (A-B)B Divide by (A-B): A+B = B Now remember, A=B, so substitute "A" for "B".... ....A+A = A [that is 2A = A] Divide by A: 2 = 1 or by the associate property of addition: -------------> 1 = 2 Thus, 1+1 cannot equal 2, because 1 = 2. QED. ![]() [Unless, of course 1 = 0, in which case my whole proof falls to pieces. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
Originally posted by MikeH
On average though, it equals 2. But are we talking about 1 or 0.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 999999999999999999999999999999999999? |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|