LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 05-21-2010, 02:29 PM   #1
Dndjzirw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
535
Senior Member
Default Well that was in depth testing!
I bet Apple can sleep safe at night now?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technolog...vs-iPhone.html
Dndjzirw is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 02:44 PM   #2
jaydicassdhy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
410
Senior Member
Default
funny.
jaydicassdhy is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 02:45 PM   #3
daasayse

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
361
Senior Member
Default
I bet Apple can sleep safe at night ?
if not I am sure there is a App for it.
daasayse is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 03:37 PM   #4
barsikjal

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
484
Senior Member
Default
funny.
We need App for that too...
barsikjal is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 04:17 PM   #5
theonsushv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
574
Senior Member
Default
It takes a lot of balls to put something as stupid as that on the internet.
theonsushv is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 04:28 PM   #6
xiaoselangone

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
542
Senior Member
Default
That's almost too embarrassing to watch.
xiaoselangone is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 04:30 PM   #7
Bromikka

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
527
Senior Member
Default
It takes a lot of balls to put something as stupid as that on the internet.
Well, I was thinking it was a bit of a piss-take - however, assuming they were using the same wireless version, the Apple application was a little faster.
Bromikka is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 04:35 PM   #8
RicyReetred

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
577
Senior Member
Default
*bites fist
RicyReetred is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 05:10 PM   #9
Julik19

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
that was a magical moment.
Julik19 is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 05:15 PM   #10
theonsushv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
574
Senior Member
Default
Well, I was thinking it was a bit of a piss-take - however, assuming they were using the same wireless version, the Apple application was a little faster.
LOL - it has to be a piss-take, but still putting something that stupid on the internet with association to the gadget show and the telegraph takes a lot of balls.
theonsushv is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 07:37 PM   #11
sleepergun

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
615
Senior Member
Default
LOL - it has to be a piss-take, but still putting something that stupid on the internet with association to the gadget show and the telegraph takes a lot of balls.
That video's got nothing to do with The Gadget Show.
sleepergun is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 07:59 PM   #12
Bromikka

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
527
Senior Member
Default
to really find out which one is faster, I'm surprised they didn't try dropping them from a tall building!
Bromikka is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 08:51 PM   #13
theonsushv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
574
Senior Member
Default
That video's got nothing to do with The Gadget Show.
Have a day off will you Bungle, I meant The Gadget Inspectors. Which you already knew.
theonsushv is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 09:00 PM   #14
UMATURLIN

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
I hope they expand their testing to computer hardware. They could finally settle the age old debate of which is better; ATI vs NV and AMD vs Intel.
UMATURLIN is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 09:01 PM   #15
RicyReetred

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
577
Senior Member
Default
Have a day off will you Bungle, I meant The Gadget Inspectors. Which you already knew.
You're onto something there. Can we have a few days a month where we can be safe from Bungle's incessant rhetorical nit-picking? Say the 8th, 14th and 28th?
RicyReetred is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 09:03 PM   #16
sleepergun

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
615
Senior Member
Default
Have a day off will you Bungle, I meant The Gadget Inspectors. Which you already knew.
No you didn't. You just got confused and now refuse to admit it. Who the hell are the "Gadget Inspectors" anyway?
sleepergun is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 09:06 PM   #17
sleepergun

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
615
Senior Member
Default
You're onto something there. Can we have a few days a month where we can be safe from Bungle's incessant rhetorical nit-picking? Say the 8th, 14th and 28th?
I was not nit picking. I was pointing out a serious error in someone's post. DM was linking an organisation to to this video that had nothing to do with it. He wouldn't have even mentioned them if he didn't think it was TGS because hardly anyone knows who the other guys are.
sleepergun is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 10:19 PM   #18
theonsushv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
574
Senior Member
Default
No you didn't. You just got confused and now refuse to admit it. Who the hell are the "Gadget Inspectors" anyway?
The Gadget Inspectors are the telegraph's gadget reviewers. It says so all over the ****ing review page and at the start of the video. I just got the name mixed up with the gadget show. Get over it.
theonsushv is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 10:20 PM   #19
theonsushv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
574
Senior Member
Default
No you didn't. You just got confused and now refuse to admit it. Who the hell are the "Gadget Inspectors" anyway?
I would happily admit it if I didn't have such a handy and convenient cover story.
theonsushv is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 10:41 PM   #20
sleepergun

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
615
Senior Member
Default
It says so all over the ****ing review page and at the start of the video.
Where?
sleepergun is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:30 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity