LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 05-21-2010, 10:57 PM   #21
UMATURLIN

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
Where?
Seriously??


UMATURLIN is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 11:01 PM   #22
sleepergun

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
615
Senior Member
Default
Seriously??


That doesn't say who or what they are,it just gives a name.
sleepergun is offline


Old 05-21-2010, 11:48 PM   #23
Bromikka

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
527
Senior Member
Default
See the "TV" in red in the picture above? Look to the right of it...
Bromikka is offline


Old 05-22-2010, 12:05 AM   #24
theonsushv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
574
Senior Member
Default
That doesn't say who or what they are,it just gives a name.
My God! I don't mind if you want to call me on something, but at least have the decency to check your facts first!
theonsushv is offline


Old 05-22-2010, 12:19 AM   #25
BliliBoopsy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
429
Senior Member
Default
I must be missing something because I have no ide who those guys are either. Just some randoms the telegraph found as far as i can tell [rofl]. I think I am understanding what Bungle means.

Seriously horrible testing tho, so glad they didnt take a stop watch to them to the nearest 0.01s tho. Although that would have doubled the humour factor for me..
BliliBoopsy is offline


Old 05-22-2010, 12:28 AM   #26
ImapFidaarram

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
537
Senior Member
Default
That was pretty much pointless, but not as pointless as the arguing in this thread.
ImapFidaarram is offline


Old 05-22-2010, 12:42 AM   #27
theonsushv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
574
Senior Member
Default
I must be missing something because I have no ide who those guys are either. Just some randoms the telegraph found as far as i can tell [rofl]. I think I am understanding what Bungle means.

Seriously horrible testing tho, so glad they didnt take a stop watch to them to the nearest 0.01s tho. Although that would have doubled the humour factor for me..
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/technology-video/

All the vidos are from "The Gadget Inspectors". It's their name for their techy section.
theonsushv is offline


Old 05-22-2010, 12:45 AM   #28
Maydayvar

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
511
Senior Member
Default
it might be a small test, but the lack of decent cellphone roundups make it already worth something
Maydayvar is offline


Old 05-22-2010, 01:03 AM   #29
blackjackiisre

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
507
Senior Member
Default
I was not nit picking. I was pointing out a serious error in someone's post. DM was linking an organisation to to this video that had nothing to do with it. He wouldn't have even mentioned them if he didn't think it was TGS because hardly anyone knows who the other guys are.
A serious error? You are literally out of your mind, there is no hope for you.
blackjackiisre is offline


Old 05-22-2010, 01:16 AM   #30
sleepergun

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
615
Senior Member
Default
See the "TV" in red in the picture above? Look to the right of it...
That tells me nothing, beyond the fact that it's a Telegraph video, which I knew already
My God! I don't mind if you want to call me on something, but at least have the decency to check your facts first!
What "facts"? Look, it may be obvious to you who these guys are, but it's not to someone who never reads the Telegraph.
I must be missing something because I have no ide who those guys are either. Just some randoms the telegraph found as far as i can tell [rofl]. I think I am understanding what Bungle means.

Seriously horrible testing tho, so glad they didnt take a stop watch to them to the nearest 0.01s tho. Although that would have doubled the humour factor for me..
I'm glad somebody understands what I'm getting at.
A serious error? You are literally out of your mind, there is no hope for you.
I've already stated the reason why it makes a huge difference whether it was the Gadget Show (which is watched by millions) or these "Gadget Inspector" people who only those who read the Telegraph would have heard of, in respect of DM's original comment.
sleepergun is offline


Old 05-22-2010, 01:28 AM   #31
ImapFidaarram

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
537
Senior Member
Default
Bungle, the fact that they are called the 'Gadget Inspectors" probably tells you something about that they do..... they inspect gadgets.
ImapFidaarram is offline


Old 05-22-2010, 01:31 AM   #32
UMATURLIN

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
Bungle, the fact that they are called the 'Gadget Inspectors" probably tells you something about that they do..... they inspect gadgets.
teehee...

They also inspect these gadgets using the latest scientific methods. I've never heard of the telegraph or the gadget inspectors before today (forgive my American ignorance), but I was able to piece together the mystery.
UMATURLIN is offline


Old 05-22-2010, 01:41 AM   #33
sleepergun

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
615
Senior Member
Default
Bungle, the fact that they are called the 'Gadget Inspectors" probably tells you something about that they do..... they inspect gadgets.
Well yeah, obviously.
teehee...

They also inspect these gadgets using the latest scientific methods. I've never heard of the telegraph or the gadget inspectors before today (forgive my American ignorance), but I was able to piece together the mystery.
You're both missing the point. The point is The Gadget Show is far more well known than these guys to non Telegraph readers.

I'm done with this thread. All I did was query one comment, and you all chose to make a big deal out it.
sleepergun is offline


Old 05-22-2010, 02:11 AM   #34
UMATURLIN

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
You're both missing the point. The point is The Gadget Show is far more well known than these guys to non Telegraph readers.

I'm done with this thread. All I did was query one comment, and you all chose to make a big deal out it.
[rofl] No that was you pointing out that DM mistakenly typed Gadget show instead of gadget inspectors. We all knew what he meant. You pointed out his "serious error". If not for that this thread would still be on page 2.
UMATURLIN is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:50 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity