General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#61 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#64 |
|
And can the corvette handle well ? |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
|
It was faster around the Top Gear test track than a Zonda... So, um... yes. It's like the 3rd place at Nuremburg too isn't it? The C6-R is constantly winning races, usually 1-2 finishes, I think the just recently added more restrictions to it even, making it more "fair" for other cars. Anyway, even if it was faster than a Zonda on a Top Gear track, i'd still put my money elsewhere. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 |
|
It was faster around the Top Gear test track than a Zonda... So, um... yes. It's like the 3rd place at Nuremburg too isn't it? The C6-R is constantly winning races, usually 1-2 finishes, I think the just recently added more restrictions to it even, making it more "fair" for other cars. Thinking about it, the archtypical 'supercar' has a certain 'f*** you' attitude about it, impractical excess that exists for no good reason other than to inspire lust and envy ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#68 |
|
A supercar isn't practical nor made with cost savings in mind, and cannot be massed produced, it's extreme to the point of irrational. It also must be priced not on it's value, but at a point only a select few can buy it. A supercar is not a means for a company to make money, but for a company to make the cars they dream about.
A Z06 fails in all of the above. Which is not a bad thing. A good example is the Maclaren F1, it's engine bay is lined with gold for heat sheilding. It's not needed and far cheaper options are out their that can do the job, but gold fitted to an engine bay no one can see is the epitomy of a supercar. On the other hand an F40 has such thin paint to save weight you can see through it, and the green goo they use to seal the interior is still visible. Ferrari would have customers sending it back for it's poor interior if it was a mass produced econo box that sold for $6K. But as a supercar it's accepted and infact loved for it's character. |
![]() |
![]() |
#69 |
|
It was faster around the Top Gear test track than a Zonda... So, um... yes. It's like the 3rd place at Nuremburg too isn't it? The C6-R is constantly winning races, usually 1-2 finishes, I think the just recently added more restrictions to it even, making it more "fair" for other cars. Driving them on test tracks is just for tv shows or giving potential buyers some numbers. Basically supercars are driving billboards, so the respective companies make the news or can say "look, this is the feeling you get when you buy our cars, even the cheaper ones". |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#72 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#74 |
|
Really, what's the defining characteristic of one? I've seen plenty of Corvettes or Vipers that would stomp a shitbox in Porches and Ferraris, but I almost never hear them called super cars? What's the defining line? |
![]() |
![]() |
#75 |
|
I disagree. The Atom is designed for those who like track days, therefore it's relatively cheap for it's performance. The company builds them for as cheap as they can and would also sell as many as it could. Hardly exclusive. |
![]() |
![]() |
#77 |
|
A super car is limited in quantity and limited to a select few to buy. It has to push technology boundaries therefore making it unique in appearance and features. Look at the Veyron, got a stupid amount of power, costs a million pounds and thats if you can get one this decade....
That to me needs a classification all of its own! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#78 |
|
Same could possibly be said for a Caterham kit car as another example, but again, you'd only use it for a fun drive out. Neither the Ariel Atom or Caterham kit cars are practical and you wouldn't want to use them for everyday driving. |
![]() |
![]() |
#79 |
|
A super car is limited in quantity and limited to a select few to buy. It has to push technology boundaries therefore making it unique in appearance and features. Look at the Veyron, got a stupid amount of power, costs a million pounds and thats if you can get one this decade.... Same could possibly be said for a Caterham kit car as another example, but again, you'd only use it for a fun drive out. Neither the Ariel Atom or Caterham kit cars are practical and you wouldn't want to use them for everyday driving. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|